Thursday, February 24, 2011

Counter-Insurgency Strategy

Insurgency relies on the following principles:

1. Defend against strength, attack weakness
2. Suprise
3. Mobility
4. Deception

Without these principles, insurgents can't beat larger forces such as the American military. Understanding how to beat insurgents requires you must know thye rely on these principles. Some of the tactics they use to achieve these principles is isolating and destroying units, feints such as a feigned retreat or feint attack, sabotage, and the most common, the ambush.
Isolated units are always prone to encirclement by large attachments of guerilla units. You can always expect them to encircle the isolated units. This means that you could counter them with a hidden ambush. Showing up on their rear, they will be suprised and forced to withdraw. Push the retreat all the way and maximize casualties before they can set up a feigned retreat. Ambushes of guerilla units also rely on predicting the route the enemy will take. Not only can you take an uncommon route, but you could also could maximize suprise by taking this route and possibly arriving on the rear of the ambush.
In the Vietnam War, 90 plus percent of the battles were decided and initiated by the Vietcong. Without the initiative, they would be prone to conventional battles they know they can't win. We couldn't take the initiative in invading the communist North because that would force China into the war. That's why the offensive and initiative are so important to counter-insurgency tactics: because they force the enemy to fight on the ground that put you in advantage. For example, if the Americans forced al Qaeda to fight in the desert, the Americans would be free to use air support, although the guerillas would likely bring the fight to close quarters. But that isn't the point. A desert fight would make the insurgents more predictable. If you knew that air support would force them to hug you, then you know they are weak against a flanking attack or against the superior American weapons. These tactics are so key against future enemies such as the Taliban or al Qaeda, usually Muslim organizations.
Next Post I will discuss American affairs in the Middle East and why it is so important.

Friday, February 18, 2011

Military Blog #1

Wars are not like what they used to be. In fact, they have to be limited because the weapons modern militaries use are so effective they have the capibility of destroying the world. This is why in today's world most people think that warfare is harder for a General because their actions are limited due to the effect of Modern weapons. Still, the American military has troubles with handling foreign insurgents and even terrorists.
Most American commanders have stressed the importance of counter-insurgency. The plan for Afgahanistan has almost always been counter-insurgency. Most people still don't understand how terrorists and guerillas alike operate. Guerillas and the form of terrorists we face today can only survive with a political ally.
Guerillas try to take the war to the people and at least give them a chance to win. What usually happens is that over time the American military is drawn into a long war that favors the insurgents because the more time Americans waste accomplishing nothing, the more anti-war the American public becomes. Eventually, there will have to be a withdrawal from the war. At this point in time, the guerillas now turn into conventional fighters, destroying the now inferior force they face.
The more appropriate method for future warfare in America is counter-insurgency. The question is: how do we carry out a strategy such as this one? The answer will be revealed in my next blog regarding counter-insurgency strategy.